Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Big West Conference Men's Soccer Tournament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST isn't a good argument to keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

2012 Big West Conference Men's Soccer Tournament

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT for "Articles about notable games should have well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats" and "For a games or series that is already covered as a subtopic in another article, consider developing the topic in the existing article first until it becomes clearer that a standalone article is warranted." Issue already exists and noted with WP:PRIMARY. Also doesn't appear to pass more general WP:EVENT or WP:GNG requirements. GauchoDude (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 17:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as it's just stats, and no evidence of notability. Agree 100% with the nominator's rationale. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of independent coverage. Miles away from WP:GNG. C679 08:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - NCAA Division I Soccer Conference Tournaments are generally considered notable due to the automatic bid in the NCAA Tournament the champion gets, and almost every other conference tournament from 2012 and other recent years has its own article. No reason this should be any different. The article could be expanded a bit, but it satisfies WP:GNG. Smartyllama (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Is pretty far from satistfying GNG or EVENT. No credible claim of significance. Omni Flames   let's talk about it  04:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Almost all other NCAA Division I conference soccer tournaments, as well as tournaments in other sports, have articles. Should they be deleted too? It is notable because the winner gets an automatic bid in the NCAA Tournament, the biggest tournament in college soccer. Conference tournaments in Division I college sports are generally considered notable, I thought. That's why we have them all. Smartyllama (talk) 12:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.