Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 FC Tofaga season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:00, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

2012 FC Tofaga season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page doesn't follow WP:GNG or is in a team that competes in an professional league. Matt294069 (talk) 22:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:30, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:30, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify Enough info but no reference. Draftify this until it meets requirements Germcrow (talk) 17:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The thing is, the team doesn't compete in a professional league which is one of the requirements for GNG. So putting in a draft wouldn't help in the article use for WP:N. Matt294069 (talk) 22:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - it's a requirement for WP:NSEASONS but that doesn't trump the GNG. Would it be surprise if the top team's season in a nation where football is the number one support, might meet GNG requirements even though not fully-professional? I can't see much indication that anyone has really researched very far. So why not put in draft, for if references can be found, then it would help it meet WP:N Nfitz (talk) 02:33, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - oddly, the lead doesn't say what sport this is - according to WP:NSPORT, sports related articles must meet WP:GNG which states that there must be "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - as this article has no citations at all, it does not meet the notability requirements and therefore delete - Epinoia (talk) 01:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.