Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Tour de France


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  redirect both to Tour de France.  Jujutacular  talk 20:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

2012 Tour de France

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod, removed without edit summary. There exists no verifiable information on this event. Yes, it's highly likely to take place, and yes, it's highly likely that there will eventually be verifiable information on it, but we at Wikipedia don't deal in "highly likely" speculative futures. There is precedent for deleting an article at AFD and then subsequently re-creating it when verifiable information emerges. Should 2013 Tour de France be de-prodded (I'm a little surprised that prod is currently still up), I'd like to bundle it in with this, for the same reeasons. Nosleep ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 02:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 2013 Tour de France was just deprodded (silently by an IP) a few minutes ago. Can it be considered bundled in? Nosleep  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 15:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No need as there is little to no content, and WP:FUTURE.  Allmightyduck &#xF8FF;  What did I do wrong? 02:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tour de France as a plausible search-term.  Lugnuts  (talk) 06:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - There's nothing in there that's worth saving (with the exception of the sidebox, the article reads, "The 2012 Tour de France will be the 99th Tour de France"). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  12:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect Agree with Lugnuts, I would search that (as I would sometimes search 2022 FIFA world cup etc) Dengero (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect both articles to parent article as common practice for articles that eventually will be filled with content. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect both articles, they're both speculative. Cliff smith  talk  16:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.