Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Eastleigh F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both. Secret account 01:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

2013–14 Eastleigh F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Season article for a club outside of The Football League that's not notable in my opinion. JMHamo (talk) 04:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:29, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and previous consensus here and here, amongst many others. If it's not a team in a fully-pro league (i.e. outside of the Football League in England) then it does not merit a season article. GiantSnowman 10:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - I reiterate my and other's comments from the same discussion for the proposal of deletion of the 2011-12 page - I don't understand what the problem is with keeping this. It is relevant to Eastleigh football club, I've written it so it is factual, rather than including any opinion, and the information is from club's website so is a reliable source of information. The whole point about wikipedia is to expand and provide people with information. I could understand the argument if the page was not being maintained throughout the season. But since I am maintaining it, the point about the club playing outside of a pro league is irrelevant. A flexible rather than a rigid application of the rules would not go amiss in this type of situation. User:GrimReaper66 12:00, 25 August 2013 (GMT)
 * Delete - There is nothing notable about this season. If you want to put specific information about the history of Eastleigh FC onto the internet, I suggest you create your own Eastleigh FC wiki site. – PeeJay 15:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- The club may be sufficiently notable to have an article, but only teams in the top 4 (fully professional) leagues/divisions (i.e. below Football League) should be having anything more detailed like a seasonal article. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, club does not play at a level anywhere near high enough to satisfy WP:NSEASONS. Fenix down (talk) 08:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - the 2011–12 Eastleigh F.C. season is being discussion for deletion here - no need to have the same discussion two places
 * Delete Season articles should only be allowed for clubs in fully pro leagues. Number   5  7  22:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - take away references from the cub's website and WP:ROUTINE coverage and nothing is left. There is no reliable source that has written about this club's season. Fails WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.