Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 NHL hat tricks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 19:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

2013–14 NHL hat tricks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is just listcruft. Delete per WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Tchaliburton (talk) 00:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Hat tricks, while rare, aren't so unusual that they merit a list of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarityfiend (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. I am inclined to agree. FWIW, two other editors created a series of lists that go back to at least 1989–90 NHL hat tricks.  If this AFD ends in delete, a block nomination of the rest would likely follow. Resolute 14:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Transwikiing to the ice hockey Wikia may be valuable, however. Resolute 14:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, and I'd have no objection to ashcanning the lot. What makes this any more noteworthy a list than, say, game misconducts?   Ravenswing   15:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to 2013–14 NHL season. Probably not enough for it to stand on it's own, but it still could provide a useful component for a section in the parent article. Ejgreen77 (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'd oppose on WP:UNDUE grounds; this would be a "section" that, with references, would be over half the size of the season article, which is far too much for what is effectively a trivia section.   Ravenswing   01:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, per reasons brought forward by the nominator. GoodDay (talk) 01:04, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is never done. An article just for a stat in a single season?  Enigma msg  15:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.