Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Atlantic Sun Conference men's soccer season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Whether it should be merged, redirect, cleaned up, or kept independently can be discussed on the talk page. There isn't a consensus to delete here, and I see no reason to relist. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

2013 Atlantic Sun Conference men's soccer season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

what's the real need for this article if (please correct me if I'm wrong) the pages for the other years don't exist? Beyond that there seems to be little encyclopaedic value for this (even assuming that there were those complementary pages). Kingoflettuce (talk) 15:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 15:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and clean up notable, searchable topic that just needs to be expanded with relevant information. Also, the basis of this nomination seems more like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Quidster4040 (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with Quidster4040, the nominator provides no valid reason for deletion. The argument provided could just as well be made to create articles for all the other seasons. We can be sure that any NCAA Div 1 season has adequate reliable sources, so time and effort used on AfD is better applied to improving the article. Jack N. Stock (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * it's really fairly obvious, ppl like u condone the clogging up of wikipedia w total garbage - we have enuf junk as it stands. If you truly feel there are adequate sources, blah blah, show them, establish GNG, and volunteer to improve it. I, on the other hand, feel that we are much better off blowing it up - I cannot profess to want to salvage something rather hopeless here. Prove me wrong! Kingoflettuce (talk) 12:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak keep/redirect there's a lot of really poor quality articles on college soccer with inadequate sourcing. College soccer is one of those weird things that WP:FOOTYN doesn't speak to. Keep if WP:GNG can be established, otherwise redirect to Atlantic Sun Conference. Jay eyem (talk) 14:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced, no evidence of notability (WP:GNG failure). GiantSnowman 15:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Week Keep Keep if WP:GNG can be established.Avaay (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST is not a reason for deletion. Smartyllama (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy - could be notable, but in it's current state it is just a list of unreferenced stats. Looks like it is still under construction so better to leave that to someone to do in their sandbox. Fenix down (talk) 12:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - the proper policy here is WP:SPORTSEVENT as WP:NSEASONS is only for teams and not competitions, and it fails this considerably, as there are no references and only a list of standings; this also means it completely fails WP:NOTSTATS. I typically would vote keep for this sort of thing based on the quality of the nomination, but it's such a clear delete to me. Also note a related AfD: SportingFlyer  talk  04:50, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.