Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Ekayana Monastery bombing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I don't think an additional relisting would bring us to a consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 04:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

2013 Ekayana Monastery bombing

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Just a news story, no significant coverage beyond news reporting. The big ugly alien ( talk ) 23:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Terrorism,  and Indonesia.  The big ugly alien  ( talk ) 23:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. This event did not receive WP:ROUTINE news coverage, but international news coverage ,  and Time magazine analyzed the event in the context of Myanmar's Muslim-Buddhist conflict . Longhornsg (talk) 03:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The coverage was beyond routine in that it was analyzed in the pattern of something else (the Buddhist-Muslim conflict in Burma), however it fails WP:SUSTAINED so I feel like at most this should be merged somewhere. I can't think of where... PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, seems notable as it passes WP:GNG and coverage seems to go beyond WP:ROUTINE. Ednabrenze (talk) 19:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.