Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Formula One season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 08:53, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

2013 Formula One season

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Three years into the future, WP:CBALL. No announced calendars, no drivers signings, appears to have been created simply because it could. Too far into the future for any verifiable details to exist. Falcadore (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Seriously, massively premature. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, far to in the future. QueenCake (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Completely unnecessary. Clearly created to grab the glory of creating such an article. And as for the content.... - mspete  93  21:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. DH85868993 (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Cs-wolves  (talk)  00:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – As the others say, it's too early to create this article since there is no information that can be backed up by sources at the moment.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 00:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Whilst there's a couple of things in there, it's nothing that isn't speculation. Tell you what tho... give the author of this article some time to see what he has to come up with. Don't rush things. Antimatter31 (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are absolutely no confirmed details about the 2013 season. Until there is, this article shouldn't exist. --Kostas22 (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I think there are already some confirmed details (e. g., GPs), but not so much. But I think deleting and then re-creating this article a few months later, when there will be obviously more certain details, has no point. SuperR (talk) 19:48, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Response to comment: We are at least a year away from firm details being announced for even a reasonable guess at a calendar and two years away from getting good indications on which drivers will belong to which team. This is not a case of something being deleted for only a few months. I could not see a stable version of this article not formed almost entirely of speculation, properly forming until very late in 2011. --Falcadore (talk) 23:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I believe that since more details are coming up now and it IS late into 2011 as said in the deletion discussion, the article should be startet. I don't do it though because I don't want to take the work only to have it deleted by hard-liners. I also believe that after the last new start in the spring of 2011 a new deletion discussion would have been in order because some time had elapsed and new facts may have shown up even then. --Krawunsel (talk) 08:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)