Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 London Broncos season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 19:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

2013 London Broncos season

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Just empty tables; fails WP:CRYSTAL. Perhaps userfy? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Userfy - Give them time to work on the article, I already userfied one of the other articles created by the same user, User:Migitgem2009/2013 Salford City Reds season. GB fan 23:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The creator has commented on the talk page: "I have created this page because their 2012 season finished following the win against Hull KR. So this is their current season. In addition to this recruitment has already started for the 2013 season hence why I have created the pages now so there is less to do later. I strongly believe this page SHOULD NOT be deleted as I want to have all Super League clubs 2013 season pages correct and up to date unlike previous years. Migitgem2009 (talk) 19:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)"
 * Keep. The page needs to be reworked but is notable. Mattlore (talk) 00:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Userfication would not prevent Migitgem2009 from preparing the framework ready for when content is available. Neither of your makes a case why this route is not appropriate. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Userfication would hinder others contributing to the season page. I see s/he is starting all 14 SL club season pages - which is probably misguided. I see the problem here as he has chosen the wrong template to do this, not that the page should be userfied. I will have a go at clearing it up. Mattlore (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I think my edits should have addressed most of the concerns; I have either filled in or removed the templates. Mattlore (talk) 06:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article is filled with information, fixtures, transfers and stuff. Kante4 (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has plenty of content now. AutomaticStrikeout 23:06, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on additional information added to article. No reason to userfy pending the start of the season. Monty  845  15:27, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.