Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Moroccan protests


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 21:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

2013 Moroccan protests

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page was created as a stub in conjunction with the ITN nomination of Daniel Galvan, a non-notable crimianl whose article has also been nominated for deletion


 * Delete This page has no notability of its own and was created to support the languishing Daniel Galvan at In the news/Candidates. It has been suggested the article be merged, bt doing so gives neither article the notability to stand alone or together. μηδείς (talk) 21:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that the !vote above is made by the nominator of this AfD.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. BabbaQ (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - I created this stub after I saw many requests for it. Anyway, these are highly notable protests. The nominators only rationale seems to be that the article that was created this afternoon is a stub and that it is nominated for deletion by the user who made the comment. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. BabbaQ (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You are to be commended for taking the initiative. Your effort is regardless of the eventual turnout. μηδείς (talk) 23:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * To be honest I do not really care if these articles gets deleted or not. I only made the stubs because of the requests basically.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 7.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  22:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. There are no apparent lasting repercussions. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:36, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Lasting? Its been like a few days sir...:) And NOTNEWS? Wikipedia is based on news :)--BabbaQ (talk) 23:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)--BabbaQ (talk) 23:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You've said it yourself: "a potentially important event" and "it's been just a few days". If it becomes an actually important event, then it would deserve an article, not before. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - From WP:NOTNEWS, which is policy, by the way: "While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion." This, by the looks of it, just seems to be a newsworthy item that isn't notable enough for an article. T  C  N7 JM  10:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * keep it needs expansion and that's not a reason for delete. Its notable as protests with repercussions, and weve had many of them.Lihaas (talk) 10:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - Probably to early to make a judgment either way about this, yet. Further protests over the last 24 hours passed off peacefully, so this issue is still simmering, though perhaps calming down. Dolescum (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * This is ready to close and delete. No material has been added since the stub was created, the related article on Galvan has been deleted and the creator has expressed his indifference to it. μηδείς (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.