Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 PDC-E


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

2013 PDC-E

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Could not find SIGCOV for this object. This fails our notability guidelines. Jontesta (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Without a convincing argument to Keep or an existing target article, it is likely this article will be deleted. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'd expect there to be a Planetary Defense Conference article that this could be merged to. Is the conference itself not notable? SevenSpheres (talk) 14:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Good idea. A quick Google search shows the conference to be held in every odd numbered year. Last year was Vienna; next year Cape Town. Each seems to be reported by the United Nations and by some other reliable source. We could start by simply renaming the existing notional asteroid article to Planetary Defense Conference, then generalizing the first paragraph and adding bullet points or perhaps even sections about later editions. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.