Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Toronto Lynx season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

2013 Toronto Lynx season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSEASONS, WP:GNG, and WP:SOURCES. Kingjeff (talk) 22:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they also fail WP:NSEASONS, WP:GNG, and WP:SOURCES.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. GiantSnowman 15:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete 2013 River City Rovers season (I'm voting only on an article that I watch) - Reason: There's no article there to speak of, and no references, so it naturally fails WP:GNG. There's no need to even consider another guideline.  Stevie is the man!  Talk • Work 16:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note also that Category:River City Rovers seasons needs to be deleted along with it. Stevie is the man!  Talk • Work 16:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete all - fail WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS, not a team in a top professional league, no indication of any reliable sources discussing these clubs' particular seasons outside of WP:ROUTINE match reporting. Major WP:NOTSTATS issues as well due to the near complete lack of sourced prose. Fenix down (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete All - Fails WP:GNG WP:NSEASONS etc. per above comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - every club I checked meets WP:GNG. Perhaps these should be done individually. See, , , Nfitz (talk) 23:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The first and third source has nothing to do with any club season article. Kingjeff (talk) 23:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * They are surely significant media coverage of things that are part of the Lynx's season, and should be mentioned in the season's article. It's clear that these teams in mid-size cities are getting significant regional media coverage. Nfitz (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The first and third source has no bearing on the Toronto Lynx's 2013 season. They would be used in the main Toronto Lynx article. I hardly say that one regional newspaper for each team is good enough to establish notability. You are assuming that if one team from a mid–size market has a media outlet covering the team, then all will. If this is true, then prove it and show where we can find sources for these articles. Kingjeff (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.