Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 World Tour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ged UK  13:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

2013 World Tour

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Useless disambiguation. Many things are referred to as a "2013 World Tour", same with 2012, 2011, 2010... This is what we have categories for. — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 15:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't mind either way whether this is kept or deleted; I created it after a renaming another article (on a concert tour) that originally had this name. Categories wouldn't cover this page's scope, however—the page covers both sporting and musical events; I can't see how someone searching for the ambiguous term of "2013 world tour" could find what they want using categories.  matt (talk) 18:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Searching for "2013 world tour" yields all the pages listed on the disambiguation page plus quite a few more. You are correct that this isn't a category either.  Looking at the search results makes me think all of the search results would be on the disambiguation page, but that's not particularly useful to create a page of search results.  A PTM search of article titles has 6 that would generally not need disambiguation. --DHeyward (talk) 08:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep And expand. A likely search term which helps the average reader. Articles and categories go hand-in-hand per WP:CLN.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 18:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Personally, I find a disam page more user friendly and less forbidding looking than a category page. I would imagine that casual visitors would feel this even more. Peridon (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as per above. Put it this way - where would you redirect this title? If you come up with a bunch of suggestions, it's better left as a disambiguation page. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:28, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PTM. This is a partial title match.  --DHeyward (talk) 07:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep Disambiguation pages are harmless and this one is potentially useful. J04n(talk page) 23:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.