Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 in music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Clear agreement that this collection of entirely redlinks is crystal balling. WilliamH (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

2013 in music

 * – ( View AfD View log )

giant flaming WP:CRYSTAL Gaijin42 (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As it stands it's a collection of redlinks. Obviously 2013 will happen and I'll take a wild guess that music will be a part of it, so no problem with it being recreated towards the back end of this year. With sources, of course.  Lugnuts  (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Dont forget the mayan apocalypse. It might not happen too :) Gaijin42 (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per Wikipedia:CRYSTAL -- which explicitly states that "Individual items from a predetermined list or a systematic pattern of names, pre-assigned to future events or discoveries, are not suitable article topics, if only generic information is known about the item." I would almost say that this even qualifies for speedy deletion per G8 and A3 — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 20:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Crytstal C T J F 8 3  11:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.