Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014-15 Premier League Results


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anyone who thinks a redirect might be useful may of course create one at this title. Deor (talk) 09:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

2014-15 Premier League Results

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a collection of statistics. Kingjeff (talk) 18:13, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment – However, other individual football teams also have sections based purely on previous results. Could this page be merged into the main premier league page, perhaps? M00036 (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment – WP:NSEASONS states that there should be well–sourced prose. Therefore, they're in violation of WP:NSEASONS. Kingjeff (talk) 18:38, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete – A stats article is not needed, results can be found on the mainarticle. Teamseasons have matches if a user is interested in them. Kante4 (talk) 18:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS. Even the parent article comes close to violating that policy, but this one is way too far. – PeeJay 18:57, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete – This article is not needed as footballboxes with results exist on the season articles for the teams and the rest exist on main premier league season article. Also agree with above. QED237&#160;(talk) 20:13, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above arguments. All this stuff is or will be in other articles. How long would this article be by the end of the season? Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Content should be in 2014–15 Premier League, and no need for a separate article. Number   5  7  21:48, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. and above comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree with the above comments, and accept that it is not needed. However, if it were to be added into the main article, how would it be done? (I'm new to Wikipedia, and so I don't know much about the requirements for inclusion in articles)M00036 (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Just the results table is used in the mainarticle, the footballboxes would be deleted. Kante4 (talk) 10:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You could also add prose to the article. Kingjeff (talk) 20:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to 2014–15 Premier League. Nfitz (talk) 23:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I said Delete rather than Redirect as I don't see any reason that someone would search on the longer term "2014-15 Premier League Results" rather than "2014–15 Premier League" --Jersey92 (talk) 02:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - as an unnecessary fork. Fenix down (talk) 09:14, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2014–15 Premier League per Nfitz. GiantSnowman 09:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete/ Redirect - Most of the content is already covered in "2014–15 Premier League", there is no point duplicating the content. IJA (talk) 13:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I think it will be very helpful if at least we link every result in the "Results Table" to the report. That way whoever wants to can go and pull up the full statistic page for each match. If Wikipedia is not a collection of statistics, then we should facilitate the access to external sources with more detailed results. I kind of wish this was done to previous seasons as well. -- Kndimov (talk) 21:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it should be the form of prose. League season articles tend to lack prose. Kingjeff (talk) 21:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.