Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Formula One season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Delete all per WP:SNOW Mandsford 01:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

2014 Formula One season

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Irrelevant page that is way too far into the future. They also do not display enough new information, which is the only reason why a new season page would be made. Examples are new teams, rule changes, etc. RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all too far ahead, and they all display no new information.
 * RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * RomeEonBmbo (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete all per WP:CRYSTAL. Compare solid delete at Articles for deletion/2013 Formula One season. JohnCD (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all The content of each article is "The 20__ Formula One season will be the ___th FIA Formula One season." (2014 is the 65th, 2015 the 66th, etc.  I'm not sure why these articles were considered necessary, but no point in keeping all these for the next 4 to 10 years.  Mandsford 20:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Four years is too far ahead. scope_creep (talk) 21:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has no contents, no references, nothing worth salvaging. Unexpandable stubs set too far in the future for contents to be anything other than WP:Speculation. Also consider 2013 Formula One season deleted six times now. Speedy criteria A1 and A3 could both apply. --Falcadore (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all, pointless placeholders with little information not already in the title of the entries. Hairhorn (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy if possible Delete Why do people keep putting this sort of thing up? When info that's verifiable is available is quite soon enough. OK, there is a remote possibility that some nut will record an album called '2019 Formula One season' and hijack the title. I'd prefer the odds on winning the lottery.... Peridon (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, all per nom. Cs-wolves  (talk)  23:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wow, is it snowing already? Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, all per nom. DH85868993 (talk) 08:09, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all - User:Falcadore brings up good point that  2013 Formula One season has been deleted six times now.   ∙:∙:.:  pepper  :.:∙:∙   13:49, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.