Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015–16 Cowdenbeath F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

2015–16 Cowdenbeath F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is unnecessary, offers no more content or context than available at Cowdenbeath F.C. and is unlikely to be updated. Exxy (talk) 20:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. GiantSnowman 17:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * These are professional clubs and I'm fairly certain with work they could meet GNG, however a mass of articles were created that no one has any intention of updating. As the nominator says they offer no more in there current state than the main article. GS we do usually allow articles at this level and it certainly wouldn't have less coverage than the English National League. However it is my view they should be deleted. Blethering   Scot  21:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  19:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NSEASONS. The club do no play in a fully professional league, nor in the top tier of their respective country therefore, by neither count could they be considered to be competing in a "top professional league" per NSEASONS. Perhaps at the end of the season, there will be sufficient significant, non-routine, reliable coverage to create an article comprising significant elements of sourced prose, but not at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 14:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG, complete lack of coverage from reliable sources. The club doesn't play in a fully pro league. Wikipedia articles should be more than just a collection of stats and results. Spiderone  19:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.