Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015–16 PJHL season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

2015–16 PJHL season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced, does not meet WP:NSEASONS, and I can find no sources that discuss the subject as a whole; does not meet WP:GNG. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Article has had a PROD removed; ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 04:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Ice hockey. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment/Leaning towards deleted The information mentioned in the article seems to be incorrect as there is some confusing regarding the champion as well. The article stats that Saskatoon Quakers were the champions but on the Saskatoon Quakers page, it's mentioned that the team last played in 1958. Thanks Fifthapril (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Just noting that it appears there were multiple teams with that name over the years, but one of the major hockey prospect sites lists the current Quakers team as being founded in 2002 and beginning PJHL play in 2007 --WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/loopback 08:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the clarification. Appreciate it. Fifthapril (talk) 04:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete due to lack of sourcing but not convinced it would fail NSEASON in all possible configurations. Not opposed to someone properly sourcing the article and would re-evaluate if they did. --WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/loopback 08:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.