Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Cerezo Osaka season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Microwave Anarchist (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

2015 Cerezo Osaka season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As discussed here though it technically passes NFOOTY, it comprehensively fails GNG, is possibly a COPYVIO and does not even contain a line of prose, so deletion seems to be the only option here. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 08:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 08:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 08:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they suffer from the same issues:

Many thanks, Microwave Anarchist (talk) 08:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You can't COPYVIO statistics. These are all valid articles, but they fail WP:NOTSTATS, but failing WP:NOTSTATS is a very easy thing to fix by adding even a little bit of prose. SportingFlyer  T · C  10:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added prose to the 2015 season article. It's not great and I'm not sure I can do much else given the language barrier, but the topic's not non-notable. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * And for 2017, when they won a double. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for expanding those. I'm happy to withdraw the nom if you have an appetite to expand these but am unsure what to do with the hundreds of ones like this. Perhaps I could move them to draft space for the time being or something like that. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm not actually happy about having to expand them. I wouldn't mind starting a conversation somewhere about these sorts of articles, more in depth than the one I posted on the football wikiproject. I might support redirecting these somewhere but there's really no perfect answer: it's a type of article which can fail WP:NOT as written improperly, which places these in some sort of weird notability zone. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, a wider discussion would be helpful, but imma withdraw this for now. I might go about moving some of these to draftspace, as some other editors have done the same. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 13:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.