Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 DR215


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 14:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

2015 DR215

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails all notability criteria from WP:NASTRO. This asteroid has no reliable media coverage—it is all sensationalist news headlines. There is nothing noteworthy about its orbit and close approaches with Earth; JPL's database shows its physical properties are practically unknown, and that has never made, or will make any close approaches within 17 lunar distances to Earth in the past/future 200 years. The 11 March 2022 approach isn't even significant enough for NASA to bother making radar observations of the asteroid. N rco0e   (talk · contribs)   03:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: it satisfies WP:GNG, receiving brief but significant coverage. Some of the infobox data appears incorrect compared to a JPL Small-Body Database Lookup. If the consensus is to delete it, then it could be redirected to the Atira asteroid article where it is already listed. Praemonitus (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect, no notability, just passing mentions in a few publications. Artem.G (talk) 09:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.