Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Florida State Mall shooting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

2015 Florida State Mall shooting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Routine crime story with no evidence of long term notability. Article says it was a domestic dispute. Legacypac (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  22:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  22:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to have been a domestic dispute with nobody else involved. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 22:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete no indication of lasting significance. Suggest author see Wikinews, you can even use your same login! Crow  Caw  22:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is not a significant event and Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS.- MrX 23:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed. Appears to be domestic dispute with potentially one unintended victim. Sad and senseless, but not something noteworthy that warrants an article. --Dwimble (talk) 23:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Note also Elizabeth Trickle and Donna Evans, witnesses to the event and likely WP:BLP1E violations. Currently re-directed to this article. Crow  Caw  23:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I just CSD A7'd them.- MrX 23:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTNEWS. We can always create an article in the unlikely event that this eventually does become notable. Author also created articles on the local police departments and the mayor that have now been redirected to the municipality. Meters (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete this and all of the Melbourne-related articles that have been created (about the mayor, police station, etc) per WP:NOTNEWS.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 06:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 10:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. A clear case of WP:NOTNEWS....William 16:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Police blotter type news. (Also misnamed BTW). Student7 (talk) 19:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong keep The man had multiple guns in his car and pockets full of ammunition. He obviously intended some sort of a domestic terrorist mass shooting, and shooting his wife who was cuban appears to be some sort of grim cover story. It is clearly one of a series of attacks on shopping malls, and comes not long after the terrorist attack on a jewish supermarket in Paris. The frequent and often successful attempts to delete documentation of similar incidents makes it difficult to connect such events. It received coverage on mainstream and international news. Crime blotter news does not make international headlines. Redhanker (talk) 22:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * He had a dispute with his wife, then showed up at work and shot her. A coworker tried to wrest the gun away and was himself shot. The gunman then shot himself. If he "intended" anything more, he would have done so until the police showed up. It is clearly a sad and all too common domestic dispute. Lets not try to find connections ourselves, because one can connect all sorts of individual details in one's mind, that doesn't make them factual. Crow  Caw  23:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. It was a fatal domestic dispute.  This belongs on Wikinews, not Wikipedia.  I think this can pretty much be snow closed.  Like others have said, we can recreate this article if/when it satisfies WP:EVENT. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.