Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 MLS SuperDraft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkativerata (talk) 05:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

2015 MLS SuperDraft

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This really should just be a speedy delete considering how 2013 was deleted through afd. this definitely against WP:CRYSRTAL JDDJS (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. A clear case of WP:CRYSTAL, and precedent at Articles for deletion/2013 MLS SuperDraft. - htonl (talk) 00:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. A single transaction is not enough. There should be some threshold number that drafts need to meet before they're created, such as five (even though this is completely arbitrary)  But for now, the one trade info should be merged to the bottom of 2012 MLS SuperDraft. Ravendrop (talk) 02:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Why not collect any traded picks on a dedicated page in someone's userspace, similiar to this page for NHL picks? This way, the 2015 traded pick does not become forgotten once the 2015 article eventually has been created in mid-2014 or so. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That would work as well. I was not aware of such a page before hand but like the idea. Ravendrop (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom and Htonl. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - four years away?! WP:CRYSTAL. GiantSnowman 13:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - an event 4 years in the future. The one piece of information could be added to MLS SuperDraft until it is time to recreate the article,   GB  fan  13:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.