Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Växjö Arsons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

2015 Växjö Arsons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRIME. Seems to be a fairly-routine crime spree with no real notable events or consequences. Mdann52 (talk) 17:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom + it's likely not even a crime spree. What ties the fires together is the city and year, nothing else. Sjö (talk) 06:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete A series of minor events tied together by nothing but geography. If this is a spree indeed, then that needs to be verifiable. /Julle (talk) 18:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:18, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Some new commentary deems proof of a notable main event pertaining to this crime spree. The Selective Composition (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Shellwood (talk) 23:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - per consistent and persistant coverage since. Per WP:GNG. Clearly notable beyone ONEEVENT.BabbaQ (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NCRIME. There's nothing more than run-of-the-mill coverage.    Dr Strauss   talk   08:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.