Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Winter Deaflympics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

2015 Winter Deaflympics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is already an article for the Deaflympics, and it doesn't seem proper to have a rather brief, undescriptive article for every time the Deaflympics occurs. I propose that we delete (or merge, if possible) the specific year-by-year articles listed on Template:Deaflympics. Biblio (talk) WikiProject Reforming Wikipedia. 00:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Delete. I don't feel we need to have a separate page for each of the events at this point. These could be on the main Deaflympics page. Dane2007 (talk) 03:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm not sure a "need" for an article or it being "proper" are really relevant points, the event is notable enough for its on page. See sources such as, , , , which could be used to expand the article to look something like we have for each Olympics/Paralympics/Commonwealth/Pan-American etc. Games with sections on the host selection, sports contested, venues, opening & closing ceremonies, medallists and so on - Ba se me nt 12  (T.C) 16:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep There have been enough competitions that including all that information on the main article for each of them would be unwieldy and create an unnecessarily long article. Smartyllama (talk) 12:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: more consensus needed to close &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I say keep it as @Smartyllama basically has said what I was going to say as it would be way too long to have each medal table on the main page. So I say we keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt294069 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.