Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 hurricane season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I can userfy the conetnt if the author wishes so. Let me know. Tone 11:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

2015 hurricane season

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:CRYSTAL, no article for 2014 season etc. Also same info included in the 2009 Atlantic Hurricane Season.  Athe Weatherman   22:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Utterly non-notable future trivia. Hairhorn (talk) 22:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – Might be notable, but appears to be unverifiable.  ttonyb1  (talk) 23:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable non-notable WP:CRYSTAL. This does not take into account that hurricane names may be retired, such as Katrina is. talking  birds  23:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per User:Talkingbirds, who put it better than I was going to. Un  sch  ool  23:59, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I will update it when I learn of any retired names so please don't delete it. This is my first article and it took a long time to make it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecookmiester8 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm fairly certain that there's an article that has the names that are reserved for hurricanes for 2010, etc., although I don't know where it is. And as the old saying goes, if there ain't, there oughta be.  This would be a logical redirect to that article.  Since, as I understand it, the 2009 names will be the 2015 names (with the exception of the ones that get retired and replaced), the list of future names would be edited the same way as this article.  Mandsford (talk) 01:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wonder why wasn't it speedily deleted as nonsense-equivalent (can't talk about unpredictable factual event which will happen 6 yrs ahead). Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * In all fairness, the author wasn't making predictions about what the weather would be like in 2015, regardless of the title. Essentially, this was an attempt to list the names reserved for the 2015 Atlantic hurricane season.  Although I think that this information is available elsewhere, and that this article is unnecessary, it's not unverifiable and it most certainly is not "nonsense".  Mandsford (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment – According the the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency, "...names [are] utilized in [a] six-year cycle of names. Except for any retired names, in 2015 the 2009 list will be repeated." See .  ttonyb1  (talk) 15:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. This information, and that for the years 2010 through 2014, is in Lists of tropical cyclone names and should continue to be maintained there. To Thecookmiester8: You have my sympathy! Writing part of all of an article before discovering it is redundant happens to everyone who edits here long enough. Congratulations on getting it on your first try! Please help maintain the Lists of tropical cyclone names. Peter Chastain (talk) 21:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * userfy or delete per all, and since the original author appears to care.  Thin boy  00  @227, i.e. 04:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Userfy is perhaps the best option here. That way the creator won't feel their work has been completely wasted.. Mjroots (talk) 05:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.