Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Air New Zealand incident


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

2016 Air New Zealand incident

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a notable aviation incident; the only coverage it received was the usual routine coverage. Has not appeared to have any long-term effects on the industry. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Provisional delete unless the author supplies reliable sources.  It is currently unverified.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources found but this appears to be an incident that is too insignificant to justify an article. As far as I can tell fails WP:GNG. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 05:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete A fairly routine false alarm, doesn't meet GNG.PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, insignificant incident (a false alarm). wikipedia is not the news Ajf773 (talk) 06:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This seems to be a non-incident involving a non-bomb. Not notable enough. --Deeday-UK (talk) 09:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Speed delete Wykx  (talk) 09:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable event....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:GNG Totally non-notable non-incident--Petebutt (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm amused by Deeday-UK's comment. Things like this occur as training exercises, and an acknowledged training exercise could produce more notable material than this. - Richard Cavell (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable event, with the article badly written, containing incorrect grammar and punctuation and no sources. It also doesn't fall into the criteria stated by WP:PLANECRASH. Flashjacket348 (talk) 06:07, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - As the nominator, I'm not sure if I should be saying this, but given the situation in this discussion, it might be time to put the article out of its misery. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced and even if sourced would be not-notable as nothing happened. - Ahunt (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not noteworthy for a mention in wikipedia so certainly not as a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 17:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.