Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Bangladesh Premier League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  12:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

2016 Bangladesh Premier League

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Withdrawal by nominator. Nomination was being here for deletion but it is I am agreeing a redirect instead until it is known if this competition will happen. Please to close the nomination. Thank you. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  10:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Redirect. To Bangladesh Premier League. There being no confirmation at all of competition being held in 2016 and so all here is speculation. There are numerous issues about the BPL and its future is uncertain. Article is WP:TOOSOON. Regards,  Naz  &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  20:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment I'd support a redirect to the main article for now. The page creator seems to have a history of making unsourced articles, so maybe that's another issue that needs addressing. The burden is with them to have sources when creating such articles. Otherwise, I'd be happy for it to be deleted, as it's all guesswork at the moment.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, Lugnuts. Yes, I would be in agreement with you that a redirect being preferable. I am changing my vote above from "delete" to redirect". Unfortunately, you are spot on in your comment about lack of sources being in citation throughout the Bangladesh cricket structure, even worse being copy violations as I found yesterday and had to take action. It is something we are needing to be addressing. Thank you, Lugnuts. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  09:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.