Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Hopman Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 13:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

2016 Hopman Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Like a tooearly case. 333-blue 10:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 10:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 10:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 10:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete per nom, article is premature (WP:TOOSOON).--Wolbo (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, the article is a stub - yes - but given that the 2015 edition of this annual competition has concluded, this is the next one to happen. If this were an article about the competition several years ahead, then it would be 'too soon', but the 'next' edition is fair enough for Notability in my book. Wittylama 22:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep; early days but the next event is fair game for an article. Obviously anything further ahead would not be. Frickeg (talk) 01:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep It's the next event and not too soon. Some refs would be nice but other than that i see no reason to delete it. Kante4 (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON + WP:CRYSTAL - It can easily be recreated in 2016 where it'll be alot more backed as opposed to all the "TBA" nonsense now. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, should be recreated when we have actual verifiable details of who's playing and so forth. Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC).
 * Delete as per the reasons already stated by others such as WP:TOOSOON. It's not able to tell us anything useful at this time.Fazzo29 (talk) 11:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.