Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Vietnam F7 Futures (tennis)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting 2016 Vietnam F7 Futures (tennis) – Singles and 2016 Vietnam F7 Futures (tennis) as well, as suggested, and nobody objected. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

2016 Vietnam F7 Futures (tennis)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This event, along with all Futures events, is not notable. Per WikiProject Tennis Guidelines, minor-minor league Futures events are not notable. None of them. A layman has to understand this long-standing consensus. The Major league baseball equivalent of tennis is the ATP world tour. Anyone who watches men's tennis on tv watches the ATP world tour. That's it. Minor league tennis is handled by the ATP Challenger tour. These are never on tv and are barely notable. Long-standing consensus has been to allow the minor league tournaments to be notable and if a player actually wins the event, for that player to be notable. Then we have the ITF Tour... the minor-minor leagues of tennis. Hundreds of tiny little events that pay a couple hundred dollars to the winners. These are never notable events, nor are the players that win them. For some reason speedy-delete was denied. The seedling articles that have sprung from this non-notable event must also be deleted. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete Also add 2016 Vietnam F7 Futures (tennis) – Singles and 2016 Vietnam F7 Futures (tennis) – Doubles into this as Future articles isn't notable.
 * and add another one too...Vietnam F7 Futures. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per long standing consensus on Futures articles Spiderone  09:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.