Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 NRLB Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

2017 NRLB Championship

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A contested prod. This competition season is unlikely to meet GNG or other notability criteria, of the three sources presented, two seem to be duplicates of each other. Mattlore (talk) 10:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep as it covers a season in Dutch Rugby League's top division, but it does need improving with more sources IMHO. Skemcraig (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - per the contested prod. Would take issue were player articles to be created, but a season of the top-level of the sport in a country surely must be something that is contended when put up for deletion.Fleets (talk) 08:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Dutch Rugby League Competition. There doesn't seem to be enough coverage to justify the creation of articles for individual seasons, but I'd be ok with grouping them together in the main competition article per WP:NSEASONS. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - The highest tier of domestic rugby league in one country deserves the accreditation and recognition. References have now also been added to each match as found on the website link, http://www.rugbyleague.nl/index.php/competitie#uitslagen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.68.6 (talk) 08:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.