Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Saint-Bruno mid-air collision


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

2017 Saint-Bruno mid-air collision

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable small plane crash with noone notable involved. WP:NOTNEWS ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete fairly common training aircraft accident doesnt appear to be particularly noteworth for a mention in wikipedia. MilborneOne (talk) 14:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. We do not necessarily create or maintain articles about every aviation safety incident that happens at all; we create and maintain articles about notable incidents that can be shown to have a reasonable claim to satisfying the ten-year test for enduring significance. For example, there would be grounds for an article if this leads to major future revisions of safety procedures for pilot training or air traffic control, or if it could be shown to garner extended coverage over a sustained period of time. So I'd be willing to reconsider this if sourcing dated past March 18 could be shown — but the immediate blip of same-day coverage of an accident that just happened is not enough in and of itself. If two passenger jets collided over Saint-Bruno, the notability would be apparent — but there's nothing inherently encyclopedic about a collision between two single-pilot Cessnas. Bearcat (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - mid-airs between two light aircraft are rarely notable enough to reach the notability threshold. This one falls well short. Mjroots (talk) 12:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, not notable.ThatGirlTayler (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with above reasoning.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.