Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018–19 CA Oradea season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Some opinion to keep, but neither of these provide any sources which would suggest this season article passes any guideline. Fenix down (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

2018–19 CA Oradea season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Playing three levels below the fully professional level so not within the scope of WP:NSEASONS. Fails WP:GNG more importantly (not surprising considering their average attendance is 150 people). Spiderone 13:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  13:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  13:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  13:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 21:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - club with rich history, if at one moment the club was in a bad situation doesn't mean that the seasons history must be removed or not created at all. This proposal is just a superficial one. Rhinen (talk) 8:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Please show sources that provide significant coverage of this season to justify a separate article for it Spiderone  09:35, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails NSEASONS, there are couple others of these articles. I am sorry I can see you put a lot of work into them. But you really should checkout WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues As that only has the top league in Romania as fully professional. There is a way to honour it's history with adding the key points Club Atletic Oradea and making sure that's sourced. Most of the main club article is not sourced and that really needs sorting out if you're able to do that. Cheers. Govvy (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - While not the biggest team, GSP (arguably the biggest sports newspaper from Romania) called this team "legendary" (see here: https://www.gsp.ro/fotbal/nationala/campioana-tarilor-vecine-povestea-legendarei-ca-oradea-singura-echipa-care-a-cistigat-titlul-si-in-romania-si-in-ungaria-394106.html) I'm not a fan, but apparently this team has won the championship in 2 different countries. I think all of this proves the club's notability. And as a side note, I think Wikipedia should aspire to document as much as possible. I said it before: regarding football stuff, Wikipedia is my place to go. Dante4786 (talk) 07:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia should try to document as much notable stuff as possible. We don't usually document amateur football in this level of detail because the coverage is trivial. Have you got at least three reliable sources covering the 2018–19 season in detail? At the moment, this is a redundant WP:CONTENTFORK and should either be deleted or redirected to CA Oradea as per what it clearly states at WP:NSEASONS. Spiderone  21:31, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The article fails WP:NSEASONS as it's needs independent resources to be notable. Also the reference that Dante4786 put out as in 2013 when they were still in the top flight so that doesn't really help. HawkAussie (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Wrong. Please be more informed when making deletion requests. While the reference is indeed from 2013, the club wasn't in top flight back then. Actually, it was in "no-flight". The club was dissolved in the '60s. However, they were still considered a "legendary" club, even 60 years later. So how can a club be less notable when it's actually active? It makes no sense. Dante4786 (talk) 03:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It still stands that fails both GNG and SEASONS. HawkAussie (talk) 04:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Nobody is saying that the club itself isn't notable. We are simply stating that the 2018-19 season is not notable enough for a stand-alone article as it contains nothing that couldn't be summarised in a sentence in the main article, to be honest. Spiderone  21:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.