Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Bangalore A Division


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If any editor wishes this restored to draft space please let me know Fenix down (talk) 13:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

2019–20 Bangalore A Division

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD removed, creator made it clear there is no other information on the internet! Which in essence is a clear violation of WP:GNG. Govvy (talk) 10:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Govvy (talk) 10:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Govvy (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete/draftify - since even the article creator has admitted that this is original research, this should not be in the main space at all; since this is not a national competition, it is not inherently notable and should be required to meet WP:GNG Spiderone  11:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable. GiantSnowman 11:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete/draftify - Not notable, can't find any reference for the subject, but it's a developing article, maybe it should be moved to draft Lynndonald (talk) 19:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:GNG as mentioned above. Not all divisions in sports are notable inherently. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 08:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete/userify: The (silent) poor non-admin was bad (see history). I don't care for silent re-opening without relisting either.  Page creator should have re-alised sourcing was insufficient for wikimedia mainspace and as hasn't should be strongly recommended to create articles in draft and send articles via AfC.  There is nothing in this article that couldn't be in Bangalore A Division and would suggest that article is improved first with a list of current teams and a noting of teams that were previously in the division that are now not in it.  There is really no need for a proliferation of sub-pages of here.  Permit userfy if page creator needs it to improve Bangalore A Divisio but there's no point in a merge or a redirect being left here. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.