Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not needed, as does not pass WP:GNG. A season article for a local football competition where the overall article doesn't even exist. This was moved back to draftspace and then back to mainspace, so I object to draftifying it again, as there's no evidence it'll ever meet WP:GNG Joseph2302 (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - this essentially appears to be a regional qualifying tournament where the winner gets to play in an amateur cup for fifth and sixth tier teams. Maybe there are enough sources to scrape together an article for Coppa Italia Dilettanti Apulia but season by season results listings seem excessive given the low level and lack of coverage. If non-trivial analysis of these fixtures can be found then I'm happy to change my mind but, at the moment, this doesn't look like it's notable enough for inclusion. Delete per WP:GNG failure and WP:IINFO. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I would like to understand why this page is deleted but there are also less notable pages that do not risk deletion? Dr Salvus (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Which other articles are you referring to? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I mean for example the article 2020–21 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, 99.9% of this article is not notable. Yet this article is present and it also seems right to me, just as it seems right to keep this page, at least as a sandbox of the football project. Dr Salvus (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I suppose the main difference is that that one is the main national cup, albeit the preliminary rounds of it. I'm not sure that it's notable, though. Further discussion might be needed to establish consensus. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If there are other articles about less notable topics, that's WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and so if its anything its an argument to delete that article too... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If it was not an encyclopedia-worthy entry, in my opinion, these pages could be transferred to the sandboxes of the football project. Dr Salvus (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC) could I have an answer? Dr Salvus (talk) 22:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If by that you mean sending to the draftspace, that should be fine. The main issue, though, is that that would be on the basis that the topic is potentially notable so there would still need to be sufficient evidence that GNG could be demonstrated if more time were allowed. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I just also want to bring up this article as well as this is in a similiar vane (2019–20 Coppa Italia Dilettanti Marche). HawkAussie (talk) 04:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Move in draftspace Dr Salvus (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I oppose this, as I see no evidence that it'll ever be notable. And so at some point will just end up having to do this AfD is it goes back into article space. <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 11:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * So why did you propose it for cancellation? Dr Salvus (talk) 13:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.