Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Lleida Esportiu season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 Lleida Esportiu season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looking at this article, the references here are a lot of WP:PRIMARY resources which isn't really what you want in an article. The other references are in that same primary section which isn't good. So I think by that case, I reckon this article might fail WP:GNG.

I would also like to nominate these articles as well due to the possible failure of WP:GNG.

HawkAussie (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:14, 7 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment did you do any sort of WP:BEFORE search to see if secondary newspapers have discussed the Lleida season? Because if so, then these wouldn't qualify for deletion even if the sources are only primary. (I quickly found sources such as, but could not find sustained coverage.) SportingFlyer  T · C  03:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. GiantSnowman 08:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all per consensus that non fully-professional leagues fail WP:NSEASONS. Number   5  7  20:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Source isn't much reliable. Barca (talk) 22:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep As the creator of those for nine years, they are very useful for my work at the newspaper. I understand that may be not for everyone, but they are really important to me. Scaufape (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * @ this is going to be closed as a delete. However I will give you 12 hrs to copy these pages for your own use before I delete them. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment thank you very much for understanding, i guess you'll delete hundreds of articles not updated for years (not this case). BEST REGARDS Scaufape (talk) 13:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to nominate for deletion any other articles which are not appropriate for the encyclopedia. Stifle (talk) 16:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Scaufape. These pages are being deleted because the consensus in the discussion was that their subject does not meet our guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. That can be found at WP:GNG. Failure to update an article that has passed our notability guidelines is not grounds for deletion. I am sorry that your pages are being deleted. Many of us have had the experience. Thank you for your work on the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a sports almanac. Stifle (talk) 16:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.