Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Liberal National Party of Brisbane leadership election


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

2019 Liberal National Party of Brisbane leadership election

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Without actual numbers as to the result of the election itself (other than who won it), this article lacks a purpose that could not be achieved in the text of another article. I propose its deletion. An article like this should exist instead with the results of a list of LNP mayoral leadership elections, if there are sources for it. (Also, the "Liberal National Party of Brisbane," not a thing.) J2m5 (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Politics,  and Australia. J2m5 (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nominator. There really is not much to write about for this topic, and this article is part of a broader pattern of Totallynotarandomalt69 treating local government as if it were a state government or federal government.. Steelkamp (talk) 04:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * pretty unfair comment there - BCC is pretty widely treated as a large government which is why there are very in-depth articles for its elections, even by-elections and wards get pages
 * But I think the initial @J2m5 comment is fair so I'm happy to support delete and maybe re-direct to a more expanded section on Schrinner's page? Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 06:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The current wording "Liberal National Party of Brisbane" wouldn't be good because that's not an official name in use. So I would prefer a straight delete rather than a redirect under the current article's name J2m5 (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, support that Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 11:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Totallynotarandomalt69, please read WP:POLITICIAN. Mayors and councillors are not notable most of the time. TarnishedPathtalk 04:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Without any secondary sources (all are WP:PRIMARYNEWS), merging is not a good AtD, and there is no clear target for a merge in any case. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Following on from WP:POLITICIAN that mayors/councillors are rarely notable, I fail to see how an article about the preselection of them is notable. Tarnis<b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 04:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: can't find anything that suggests notability  --  Devokewater  | (tαlk) 19:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.