Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Saurashtra Premier League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

2019 Saurashtra Premier League

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)
 * - added for the same reason

Per this discussion at WT:CRIC, there are questions over the notability of this tournament, with similar articles being deleted in the past. The league is not of the highest level, a local tournament, failing WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 11:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough significant coverage Kpddg  (talk)  11:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Cricbuzz is given as a source to all the matches. So what's the point of deletion of such article. When I opened Saurashtra Premier League article it said that please elaborate and add more info. to it so that's what I did. So why deletion now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MNWiki845 (talk • contribs) 11:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * As noted in the nomination, the article does not have significant coverage. Cricbuzz alone cannot establish notability. Kpddg  (talk)  11:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. This league does not satisfy WP:NCRIC or WP:OFFCRIC (i. e. matches do not hold official T20 status). StickyWicket (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and Gujarat.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Yearly summary spinouts of Saurashtra Premier League are perfectly reasonable. At worst, merge and redirect back. The information contained belongs somewhere.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:55, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * "The information contained belongs somewhere" - agreed, but not on WP. It's a local/regional tournament that does not meet the notability requirements. All that's needed on the main parent page is a ref for each winner per year. The stand-alone season articles are superfluous.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 15:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete local tournament, the information about each year doesn't pass WP:GNG. As per, listing a winner on the main article is sufficient coverage for this encyclopedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and SW's comments. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Although I can see a case to redirect to Saurashtra Premier League, there's so little wider coverage that I would think delete is probably a better option; I'm not sure there's anything very much to merge. Redirecting might ensure that articles don't keep on getting created, but there's really very little of value here. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.