Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Shaybah attack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

2019 Shaybah attack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pursuant to Deletion review/Log/2019 November 26 which identified a need for more discussion of this deletion and of a clear consensus. This is a procedural nomination; myself I have no opinion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - no substantial edits by any other than the blocked editor.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yemen-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Neutral although the article was created by a blocked user, I have some information that I can add to the article. The notable thing about the attack is that it was a tactical attack by the Houthis to ruin the relationship between the Saudi regime and the Emirate regime because that field is disputed between them. Since the attack the relationship between Saudi regime and Emairte regime started to become less friendly which caused the Saudi regime to think about ending the Qatar political dispute. On the other hand blocked editor should not be allowed to create anything in Wikipedia. I will note that an admin who closes must say that it was closed on the ground of G5.--SharabSalam (talk) 22:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.