Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Brazil Judiciary scandal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, per WP:SNOW, WP:HOAX, WP:TE and WP:DE (including provocations by author). El_C 07:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

2020 Brazil Judiciary scandal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article, created by a blocked user on pt.wiki due to obvious use of Wikipedia for political purpose, is a hoax. There is no such "scandal of the Brazilian judiciary", but decisions that displeased the Brazilian government and its supporters. All sources included in the article are statements by lawyers or supporters of President Bolsonaro and his family. For example: the phrase Due to these attitudes and other scandals, such as releasing criminals unjustly, most of Brazil currently consider the judiciary to be an enemy of democracy and a threat to the freedom of speech is totally false, since 84% of the population supports the passing of a law against fake news and the popular approval of the Supreme Court reached a historic high. Furthermore, the "activist" Sara Winter was not arrested as a way of "limiting her freedom of expression", but because she and her group tried to set fire on the Supreme Court's building. I strongly suggest deleting this article. Érico  (talk)  19:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * In the "...but because she and her group tried to set fire..." the source of this is "Dário do Vale", a very tendencious and partial website, in "...but decisions that displeased the Brazilian government and its supporters..." displeased is the large part of the population for obvious reasons that involves the past previously the current government and not exclusively supporters of the current government. In the "...since 84% of the population..." is a possibly biased research by the opposition there are more important things in Brazil than worrying about satirical fake news, a clear political persecution.. Robben (talk) 01:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * "I strongly suggest deleting this article." it sounded like a fear on your part and censorship.Robben (talk) 02:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment It's great that don't debate and censor without reaching a consensus, it's a beautiful example of false democracy. "Remember, address the arguments, not the person making them." WP:Consensus Robben (talk) 00:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely biased article. DanGFSouza (talk) 19:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Totally agree after checking the sources. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The judiciary trying to actually do their jobs against someone not willing to respect their rulings or ability to be in office is not a scandal.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, a delusional hit job against the judiciary that is nothing more than an extreme POVFORK. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:HOAX Zoozaz1 (talk) 02:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.