Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Chicago State Cougars men's soccer team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

2020 Chicago State Cougars men's soccer team

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As per a related discussion at WT:FOOTY, I don't think that this particular team season meets WP:GNG. I also feel that it violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE. My main concern is that this season lacks significant coverage from independent sources. This is not, in any way, a comment on college soccer seasons in general, just that this particular one isn't notable. There should be no prejudice against this being recreated if it does rise to a level of notability later on. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete clearly fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  T · C  22:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping to previous discussion's participants -, , , , ,  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON for current college soccer seasons to have articles, and unlikely to pass WP:GNG. Also seems unlikely to make the final tournament given their first couple of games. I am not against draftifying it, but don't think it will likely ever be notable. Jay eyem (talk) 00:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Jay eyem, the only reason I think it's notable is because it's their first ever season, so it's historic -Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. I disagree with the TOOSOON argument and feel that this is an appropriate time to have articles on the ongoing season, but this one isn't notable. Smartyllama (talk) 02:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence subject meets WP:GNG Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails  WP:GNG   Devoke  water  11:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.