Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 NH90 crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

2020 NH90 crash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable military aviation accident. These are much more common events and not usually notable unless someone with a WP article is on board. WP:NOTNEWS also applies. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Meeting all aspects of Notability (events). Wikipedia is about coverage; not about how severe the incident is. This topic was main news for over a week in the Netherlands. A crash of a Dutch aircraft in this manner is unique. Every half an hour for several days in the news on all radio stations. Maybe there have been more severe incidents, but they have not been that broad in the news. There have been background articles published: read for instance this article. There will be a thourough investigation taking months. It’s highly likely the investigation will change protocols. SportsOlympic (talk) 19:43, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing notable about military aircraft crashing and no wider impact of crash (global grounding or safety recommendations). Mztourist (talk) 06:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment all NH90 helicopters stay on the ground: read here. SportsOlympic (talk) 09:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment2 The NH90 have design problems, discovered recently. This crash might have a major impact; as there has been bought recently multiple NH90s. read here. SportsOlympic (talk) 09:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Grounding is Netherlands only not worldwide, my Delete stands. Mztourist (talk) 06:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and Mztourist. Non-notable air crash that can be adequately covered in the NH90 article. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. —Brigade Piron (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination--Petebutt (talk) 02:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sufficiently covered at the NH90 article.  Wylie pedia  @ 13:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL. I am sorry for the families of the two deceased persons, but this happens all the time in the military. Bearian (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.