Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 coronavirus pandemic in Saint Pierre and Miquelon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Störm   (talk)  13:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Saint Pierre and Miquelon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG with more than 1 million confirmed cases in the world. Article could be merged into relevant topic under France PenulisHantu (talk) 17:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. See references such as and   Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:43, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. The number of cases doesn't determine if a territory is notable enough for an article or not. Super   Ψ   Dro  19:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notability is not an editorial choice, but a fact that needs to be established. Which it has. Apart from that there is also the argument that this is a breakout of a larger topic for size. Agathoclea (talk) 06:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:N is more than met; merging this to the overall French article would be confusing due to its distance from the French mainland, and there has been an impact here, however small it is; this isn't anything like a 'relationship between Burma and Haiti' article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - If it is notable enough to have a separate entry into the cases by country/territory template then it is likely notable enough to have its own article. Atlas50 (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per all of the above Spiderone  12:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.