Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021–22 Boreham Wood F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. General consensus to delete. Some suggestions to draftify. I'm happy to restore to a user's draft space if requested, but nothing in this discussion to suggest from any editor that sources yet exist to suggest GNG for any article listed here. Fenix down (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

2021–22 Boreham Wood F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

there is concensus that National League seasons fail WP:NSEASONS and no evidence of GNG, especially given that the season hasn't started yet. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they also fail GNG and NSEASONS:


 * Draftify National league seasons can pass WP:GNG - see Articles for deletion/2008–09 Cambridge United F.C. season. None of these do yet, but they will in a few months at the earliest. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Draftify per TOOSOON. GenQuest  "scribble" 21:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NSEASONS failure. Number   5  7  08:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete generally season articles don't pass WP:GNG if the team isn't fully-professional, and it's too soon for this article to demonstrate that it's an "extraordinary" season that merits an article. If they have an extraordinary season that gets lots of good sourcing about it, then article can be re-created then. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The National league gets national coverage, it's safe to assume all of these topics will be covered significantly, and NSEASONS doesn't trump a GNG pass. SportingFlyer  T · C  09:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * They don't demonstrate coverage to pass WP:GNG right now. If in 6 or 12 months this season does generate GNG-level coverage, then it can be recreated. But we shouldn't be keeping it on the assumption that it might be notable in future. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * How many EFL 2021-22 season articles demonstrate coverage to pass WP:GNG right now? Not many, I'd bet.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:40, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - per Joseph2302. GiantSnowman 11:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify per SportingFlyer. Skyblueshaun 13:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete For failing WP:NSEASONS, Should know not create level 5 or lower season articles, unless under it's a special season. Govvy (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify all - WP:TOOSOON Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify all - there is clearly the potential for these articles to pass GNG - the level of national coverage of the National League is not noticeably lower than that of League Two, and the suggestion that all League Two season articles should get automatically kept while all NL season articles should be automatically deleted is ridiculous -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Draftify, WP:TOOSOON, Alex-h (talk) 10:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.