Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021–22 Wrexham A.F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Based on article improvement and reduced opposition. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

2021–22 Wrexham A.F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROD was removed, this fails the SNG WP:NSEASONS and has been deleted twice before. Govvy (talk) 10:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football,  and Wales.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * How to I improve this article to avoid deletion, i have included well sourced references. Yurijohnson (talk) 11:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * please read Notability (sports), which says:
 * For this article to be kept we need a few paragraphs of continuous text that review the club's activities in the season, without mentioning trivial events or including extended lists. This needs to to be based on reliable sources: good starting points might be the Daily Post, or a BBC website. However, as the team play in a relatively low-level league and they did not have an FA Cup run there may be insufficient reliable sources to make an acceptable article. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You might want to. User:Yurijohnson, look at what the main-stream media has been saying. I've seen a surprising amount of coverage of Wrexham here recently in North America in relationship to Ryan Reynolds. Surely some of it relates to their current season. A couple of good references, and some text, rather than just stats, and you're golden. Nfitz (talk) 19:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Such as the 20-camera crew at Wrexham games this season, according to CBC, working on a new FX docu-series called Welcome To Wrexham. Nfitz (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your suggestion Yurijohnson (talk) 03:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I have edited a few sentences in the page Yurijohnson (talk) 03:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I have edited a few sentences in the page Yurijohnson (talk) 03:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - much improved, likely meets GNG. GiantSnowman 22:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Fails WP:NSEASONS. Number   5  7  09:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There are multiple reliable sources like BBC and ESPN to report on this team, i am wondering if they fulfill the requirements Yurijohnson (talk) 15:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NSEASONS. REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 11:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Narrow Keep Following article improvement I feel that this article can meet GNG. REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 18:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have add a few more references, is there enough coverage for this article? I saw a few sources linking to it Yurijohnson (talk) 03:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - this was a WP:NOTSTATS violation at the time of nomination and, while it does fail WP:NSEASONS, I would say that the BBC and ESPN coverage is enough to get through on WP:GNG. There is now at least some well-sourced prose in the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Can i ask why does it fails WP:NSEASONS, i saw 2019–20 Sunderland A.F.C. season page which has similar format with this. Yurijohnson (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Because Wrexham played in the 5th tier National League (English football) which is not professional per WP:FPL. There has been consensus that such articles should be deleted unless they meet WP:GNG, which I would argue this does. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The existence of similar articles is far from conclusive, see WP:WHATABOUTX. Numerous Wikipedia articles should probably be deleted, and the identification of questionable articles depends on interested editors finding them. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep I added a USA Today reference about this season's increased season-ticket sales. The article has been much improved and meets WP:GNG, and there is international coverage about the season. Ping User:GiantSnowman to review references. Nfitz (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Perhaps User:REDMAN 2019 and User:Number 57 can also review their deletes, in light of the article improvement. Nfitz (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.