Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Lancaster, Pennsylvania mayoral election


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

2021 Lancaster, Pennsylvania mayoral election

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not a G4, but no indication issues raised at Articles for deletion/2021 Lancaster, Pennsylvania, mayoral election have changed. Star  Mississippi  01:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Pennsylvania.  Star   Mississippi  01:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Courtesy pings to AfD participants, AfC accepter, refunder:  Star   Mississippi  02:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)


 * comment Notability plays no role when refunding a draft. So I am not opposing or supporting deletion, but I would be happy to make this a draft again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I approved this draft as it seemed to meet the criteria for WP:NEVENT, but happy to defer to more experienced editors.  Qcne  (talk)  08:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that insight @Graeme Bartlett. I wrongly thought it was weighed when refunded following an AfD. (And of course no issue with the refund itself) Star   Mississippi  13:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge to List of mayors of Lancaster, Pennsylvania and/or Danene Sorace. Since the last commenter invoked WP:NEVENT, I would point to WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:ROUTINE and WP:DIVERSE from those guidelines. Also, all my points from the first go-around still stand. Apocheir (talk) 01:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the above comment. It should be deleted or possibly merged if there is consensus but I don't think it is notable. If its deleted, it should be salted.    scope_creep Talk  09:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet NEVENT per policies linked in 's !vote. Like horrific crimes, not every important local election is an event... of lasting, historical significance. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 02:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.