Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Peshawar explosion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  09:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

2021 Peshawar explosion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:NOTNEWS. Curbon7 (talk) 06:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 06:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is likely to be further news coverage as the police figure out who did this and why they did it. And perhaps there will be a trial as well. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Per WP:NOTTEMPORARY we can recreate this article once it accomplish WP:GNG guidelines. Kalu Dada from Thathri Kutty (talk) 11:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, as an event that is not sufficiently notable. The fact it happened and that it is appearing in the news, and may well do so for some time yet, is not a reason to have an article. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Bungle (talk • contribs) 08:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  08:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bungle. Now even another almost week later then their comment, and I don't see substantial coverage continuing beyond the short-time aftermath. That places it NOTNEWS. DMacks (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ...with no prejudice against recreation if substantive new coverage arises. Figured that's standardly true, but didn't want to appear to be saying "no, never" as opposed to others comments. DMacks (talk) 23:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - as of today. but if further things happen, please recreate.BabbaQ (talk) 22:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.