Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022–23 MKS Cracovia season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

2022–23 MKS Cracovia season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No prose references to prove the articles notabilty. The only three citations are about the league (not specific to Cracovia), the squad (is not prose), and the league fixtures (not specific to Cracovia). As an addition, it is not updated at all and the matches are empty. Mwiqdoh (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Poland. Mwiqdoh (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly notable. A professional team competing in Poland's top division and also continental competitions, plenty of coverage out there, nominator has not undertaken before to search for any other sources., which are present at polish football websites like 90minut and Sport.pl. Poor nomination. GiantSnowman 18:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - plenty of media coverage in Google News. For example, this story could be added to the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment on relist - please can you explain why this was re-listed? There is clear consensus to keep. GiantSnowman 19:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't read Polish and therefore have no way of knowing whether the sources proposed above are reliable; this needs the attention of more Polish-speaking contributors.  Sandstein   07:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Respectfully, I don't think it's your job to assess the sourcing, it's to assess the consensus in this discussion. GiantSnowman 19:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Plenty of sources exist to justify an article per WP:GNG, is a professional team participating in a league competition, in addition to their inclusion on UEFA's website. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  21:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above comments; it passes WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 18:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close. The prior relist appears to be more of a WP:SUPERVOTE rather than an attempt to generate clearer consensus (which is surprising because Sandstein is among the best when it comes to managing AFD's). Use of Google Translate shows that the sources posted above are WP:SIGCOV to pas WP:GNG with flying colors.  Frank   Anchor  16:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.