Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 United States Senate election in New York


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

2022 United States Senate election in New York

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not adhere to WP:NOTCRYSTAL. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Keep. Seems to be anticipated in WP:NOTCRYSTAL, which states:


 * 1) Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place. If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Examples of appropriate topics include the 2020 U.S. presidential election and 2024 Summer Olympics. By comparison, the 2032 U.S. presidential election and 2040 Summer Olympics or events surrounding the 250th anniversary of the United States of America in 2026 are not appropriate article topics if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research. Avoid predicted sports team line-ups, which are inherently unverifiable and speculative. A schedule of future events may be appropriate if it can be verified. As an exception, even highly speculative articles about events that may or may not occur far in the future might be appropriate, where coverage in reliable sources is sufficient. For example, Ultimate fate of the universe is an acceptable topic.

So it's not a violation of WP:NOTCRYSTAL. —GoldRingChip 21:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Scheduled event. --Enos733 (talk) 23:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per GoldRingChip. It doesn't seem to be unfit to me. Puddleglum2.0   Have a talk?  03:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per above consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.