Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 in Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

2022 in Canada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per Articles for deletion/2022 in the Philippines. It isn't normal to have future "[year] in [country]" articles. We have a few elections listed here with unspecified dates, but as we saw recently with the UK elections, the dates and years that these happen are not always set in stone. At best it is a list of future events that are likely, at worst its WP:CRYSTAL. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    19:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON. Canada has scheduled elections but parliament can be dissolved at any time, so these dates are not set in stone. buidhe 19:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Couple years in the future is still too far out, we don't know much set in stone for then right now. Hog Farm (talk) 21:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No need to have a "future [year]" in [country] article. Looks like 2025 in Singapore should be deleted as well. Natg 19 (talk) 22:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's just too early for this article. GoodDay (talk) 04:25, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously without prejudice against recreation in late 2021 when there are actually things to start saying. Creating new articles is not hard enough that we would need boilerplate pages like this to exist this far in advance of their actually being needed or useful. Bearcat (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per Articles for deletion/2022 in the Philippines as a very bad precedent, because apparently consensus has in fact changed. I can't begin to state how categorically I disagree with this change in consensus, but it is what it is. Bearian (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment – You can have a proper article about future elections – e.g. 2022 United States Senate elections – but it has to be filled with at least some sourceable content. As something like 2022 in Canada has pretty none of that, it is probably deletable... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , Fore sure! For an article that is actually about the future election, it is totally reasonable. In fact, even WP:CRYSTAL gives advice about this "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place.". This article isn't about the 'events' it contains, it is merely a list of things currently expected to occur in 2022. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  (click me!)    11:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. D4iNa4 (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.