Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023–24 PSL Reserve League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  15:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

2023–24 PSL Reserve League

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Also per wp:not regarding a stats only article.topic. A stats only article with data on a season of a reserve league. Per SNG these are not presumed notable and require GNG sourcing. Does not have and highly unlikely to exist. North8000 (talk) 12:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and South Africa.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 13:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – Clearly fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 16:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - reserve league not presumed notable and with no evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Contributor892z (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing GNG Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete like most reserve leagues in the world, there isn't enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.